ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2026
Deep learning applied to standard radiographs improves detection of implant loosening in total knee arthroplasty: A proof-of-concept study.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence in Arthroplasty: A Comprehensive Structured Critical Review and Descriptive Evidence Map of Validation, Uncertainty, and Workflow Integration.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Deep learning applied to standard radiographs improves detection of implant loosening in total knee arthroplasty: A proof-of-concept study.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Implant loosening is a common cause of failure in total knee arthroplasty, and for appropriate treatment, the correct diagnosis is of vital importance. Detection is challenging as radiographs only reveal obvious cases, computed tomography (CT) scans are hindered by metal artifacts, and bone scintigraphy lacks specificity, while all methods are time-consuming and/or involve radiation exposure. This proof-of-concept study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) tool to detect implant loosening using a set of two-dimensional (2D) radiographs. Methods: A total of 307 radiograph sets (anteroposterior and lateral) were collected, including 159 loose and 148 fixed primary knee implants (confirmed intraoperatively during revision surgery). Images were square-cropped, centred on the implant, horizontally flipped for left knees, resized to 512 × 512 pixels and standardized for grayscale. A dual InceptionV3 DL algorithm was trained using fivefold cross-validation. Performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and receiver operating characteristic curves, with corresponding area under the curve (AUC) and compared to routine radiological reports. Results: The mean ± standard deviation (SD) sensitivity, specificity and accuracy over the fivefolds were 71.7% ± 10.7%, 87.0% ± 14.2% and 79.2% ± 4.0%, respectively. The overall AUC was 0.81, confidence interval (CI): [0.77-0.85]. The radiological report predictions reached a sensitivity of 51.3%, specificity of 99.2% and accuracy of 73.2%. The algorithm predicted significantly more cases correctly compared to standard radiological evaluations by a musculoskeletal specialized radiologist ( Conclusions: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated the feasibility of training a deep-learning algorithm using 2D radiographs to detect implant loosening. Notably, the algorithm outperformed routine radiological evaluations, highlighting its potential to enhance the detection of loosening. These results are promising, considering the limited dataset. This tool could be valuable for patients experiencing issues after knee replacement surgery, helping to rule out implant loosening while reducing analysis time, radiation exposure and healthcare costs. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.