Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560946›Full record

ArticleClinical case reports2026

Augmented Reality Visualization and Navigation Operationalized in Biopsy of Indeterminate Splenic Mass.

Alexander S Misono

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alexander S MisonoHoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian Department of Radiology, Division of Interventional Radiology Newport Beach California USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4881-3812

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case report describes the successful use of an augmented reality (AR) guidance system (XR90, MediView XR Inc., Cleveland Ohio) to assist in the percutaneous biopsy of a splenic mass performed in a minor procedure room. Traditional two-dimensional (2D) imaging modalities such as ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) present limitations in depth perception, spatial orientation, and procedural ergonomics, particularly in anatomically complex and mobile regions like the spleen. The AR system integrates real-time ultrasound, electromagnetic (EM) tracking, and pre-procedural CT data to generate a 3D holographic overlay within a heads-up display (HUD), enhancing operator spatial awareness and needle control. A 69-year-old male with a 6 cm splenic mass underwent biopsy using the AR platform alongside ultrasound. The system enabled accurate needle placement, reduced cognitive load, and provided continuous visual confirmation during the procedure. All biopsy samples were successfully obtained on the first pass without complications, and pathology confirmed high-grade B-cell lymphoma. This case highlights the feasibility and clinical utility of deploying AR-guided interventions in outpatient procedure rooms, supporting broader adoption of AR technologies in settings beyond the operating room or angiography suite.

Indexed as

3‐dimensionalaugmented realitycomputed tomographyelectromagnetichead‐mounted displayhead up display

Identifiers

PMID41560946
PMCPMC12812848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.