ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Crop GraphRAG: pest and disease knowledge base Q&A system for sustainable crop protection.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and strategies for harnessing large language models in plant protection.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Future-proofing agricultural research: FAIR principles for agriculture AI agents (FAIR4AGFrontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Knowledge-enhanced large language model construction for garlic cultivation using GraphRAG.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intelligent prevention and control of crop diseases and pests is a critical link in safeguarding food security. However, agricultural practitioners often face fragmented information and low retrieval efficiency when seeking accurate, actionable knowledge. Furthermore, general-purpose large language models (LLMs) are prone to providing inaccurate or erroneous answers when applied to these specialized domains. To address these challenges, we assembled a large-scale corpus of knowledge on crop diseases and pests. Via entity and relation extraction, we constructed a multi-relational knowledge graph covering crops, diseases, pests, symptoms, and control measures. We subsequently designed Crop GraphRAG, a new framework that integrates knowledge graphs with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This system enables local knowledge-base question answering by retrieving adjacency subgraphs for relevant entities alongside summary-based passage retrieval. To evaluate performance, we curated a domain-specific test suite of question-answer pairs and conducted comparative and ablation experiments. Our experiments demonstrate that the Crop GraphRAG framework offers distinct advantages in answer accuracy and coverage compared to baselines. Crucially, the framework effectively suppresses hallucinated content, a common issue in generative models. These results verify the practical utility of the Crop GraphRAG framework for vertical-domain question answering. By mitigating the limitations of large language models in specialized agricultural contexts, this study provides a pragmatic tool for intelligent QA in the agricultural domain and advances the application of AI in crop protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.