ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
Workflow-embedded AI as a cognitive scaffold: A randomized trial on knowledge retention and diagnostic competency in undergraduate radiology education.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of Artificial Intelligence-Supported Education on Critical Thinking, Problem-Solving, Clinical Reasoning, and Decision-Making in Health Science Education: A Systematic Review of Interventional Studies.Advances in medical education and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Traditional didactic methods in medical imaging education, predominantly reliant on static images (non-augmented, traditional PACS workflow that requires manual, unguided search and interpretation), consistently fail to bridge the theory-practice divide, contributing to high diagnostic error rates. While the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) with Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS+AI) offers transformative potential, robust evidence quantifying its impact on longitudinal competency development remains scarce. Objective: This study aims to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy of a cognitively optimized PACS+AI framework versus conventional PACS in enhancing radiology education across four critical domains: theoretical knowledge, clinical decision-making competencies, AI acceptance, and knowledge retention. Methods: In a prospective single-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT), 110 medical imaging undergraduates were randomized to PACS+AI (n = 55) or standard PACS (n = 55) groups. Theoretical knowledge was assessed using validated item-bank assessments; clinical decision-making competencies were evaluated through lesion detection, anatomical localization, diagnostic accuracy, and report completeness; AI acceptance was measured using the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM); and knowledge retention was tracked through immediate, 1-month, and 3-month follow-up assessments. The PACS+AI framework provided three core cognitive support functions: automated lesion annotation, structured diagnostic prompting, and workflow-contextualized feedback. Results: The PACS+AI group demonstrated significantly superior outcomes across all domains: theoretical knowledge retention was substantially higher (79.3 % vs. 19.7 % at 3 months, P < 0.001, d=1.95); clinical decision-making competencies showed progressive improvement with large effect sizes (Δ=12.4-18.1, all P < 0.001, d=1.88-2.48); AI acceptance scores were significantly elevated across all TAM constructs (all P < 0.001, d>1.9); and knowledge retention was maintained longitudinally with amplified effects over time. Conclusion: The PACS+AI framework significantly enhances radiology education by optimizing cognitive load distribution, resulting in sustained knowledge retention, superior clinical decision-making competencies, and heightened AI acceptance. This integrated teaching model effectively bridges the gap between theory and practice, cultivates professionals adaptable to the artificial intelligence environment, and aligns with the core needs of the new generation of medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.