Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560856›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Suspected MRI associated burn injuries in dogs.

Jamie L Peyton, William T N Culp, Rich Larson, S Jason Peters, Christine M Toedebusch, Eric G Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jamie L Peyton *School of Veterinary Medicine, One Health Institute, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
William T N CulpDepartment of Surgery and Radiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Rich LarsonSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
S Jason PetersSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Christine M ToedebuschDepartment of Surgery and Radiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.
Eric G Johnson *Department of Surgery and Radiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is widely utilized in veterinary medicine for its diagnostic accuracy and safety profile. However, thermal injuries secondary to MRI are a significant adverse event that may be under recognized by veterinary clinicians. This study investigates five canine cases of presumed MRI-induced burns with a distinctive linear pattern, ranging from superficial to full-thickness, at a single veterinary institution. The underlying mechanisms for these thermal injuries was most likely resonant circuit heating or the antenna effect, exacerbated by patient positioning and improper insulation of ECG leads. Clinical implications included delayed wound recognition, extended healing times, and substantial complications such as impaired mobility and delayed neurological rehabilitation. The findings underscore the necessity for improved MRI safety protocols, particularly regarding patient monitoring and positioning during MRI procedures in veterinary practice.

Indexed as

burncanineMRIMRI safetythermal injurieswound

Identifiers

PMID41560856
PMCPMC12813053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.