ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2026
Assessment of clinical probability scores for pulmonary embolism diagnosis during pregnancy and postpartum in women with a history of venous thromboembolism: a Highlow ancillary study.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The value of pretest clinical probability scores in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) during pregnancy and postpartum is unknown in women with a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives: We evaluate the modified Wells, revised Geneva, and pregnancy-adapted Geneva (PAG) scores for the diagnosis of PE during pregnancy and the postpartum period in women with a history of VTE. Methods: Data from a multicenter randomized trial (Highlow) including 1110 pregnant women with a history of VTE and treated with either weight-adjusted intermediate-dose or fixed low-dose low-molecular-weight heparin subcutaneously once daily until 6 weeks postpartum were used. The modified Wells, revised Geneva, and PAG scores were calculated retrospectively in all women with a clinical suspicion of PE, and their discriminative capacity was assessed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed for quantitative variables and the optimal threshold defined. Results: There were 102 suspected cases of PE, of which 12 were confirmed events. During pregnancy, the ROC curves showed an area under the curve of 0.68, 0.33, and 0.36 for the Wells, Geneva, and PAG scores, respectively. During postpartum, the ROC curves showed an area under the curve of 0.75, 0.55, and 0.52 for the Wells, Geneva, and PAG scores, respectively. Conclusion: The 3 pretest clinical scores have modest discriminatory power, during both the antepartum and the postpartum period, to classify patients into 3 categories of pretest clinical probability. Further work is required to develop clinical-decision tools to exclude imaging in pregnant women with prior VTE with suspected PE in pregnancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.