Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560763›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2026

Refining Capture and Collaring Protocols for Red Foxes.

Holly M English, Patricia Romero, Lorraine Bull, Barry Nolan, Paolo Bongi, Vilhelmiina Huuskonen, Simone Ciuti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Holly M EnglishSchool of Biology and Environmental Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8854-6707
Patricia RomeroUCD Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8331-9548
Lorraine BullBiodiversity Officer, Parks, Biodiversity and Landscape Services Dublin City Council Dublin Ireland.
Barry NolanIntegrated Wildlife Management Services Laois Ireland.
Paolo BongiHunting Office, Ambito Territoriale di Caccia - Massa Aulla Italy.
Vilhelmiina HuuskonenUCD Veterinary Hospital, School of Veterinary Medicine University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.
Simone CiutiSchool of Biology and Environmental Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife species are often captured in ecological studies to take morphometric measurements, collect biological samples and/or fit animal-attached tags to collect data on movement and behaviour. Capture may be difficult depending on the target species, with implications for the effort required by field teams, overall capture success and study goals. Though routine practice, wildlife captures have important welfare implications which should be carefully considered prior to each study. Full details on capture protocols are rarely shared with the international community, often limited to short descriptions in the methods sections of papers. More detailed information sharing can improve knowledge on methods that lead to increased or reduced capture success, saving researcher time and resources and, most importantly, boosting animal welfare. Here, we share detailed capture protocols for improving trapping success and optimising welfare protocols for our trap-shy target species, the red fox (

Indexed as

movement ecologyred foxtaggingtrappingurban wildlifeVulpes vulpeswildlife welfare

Identifiers

PMID41560763
PMCPMC12815494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.