ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2026
First dual-frame telephone survey for non-communicable disease risk and protective factors: Methods and main findings from a central Brazilian state, 2022.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To Describe the methodology used in the first risk factor survey for non-communicable diseases in Goiás, a central state of Brazil and identify differences in prevalence of risk and protective factors for chronic disease between landline and mobile phone users. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted using telephone interviews via landlines and mobile phones. The Random-Digit Dialing probabilistic sampling method was used to select phone lines. The Rake method weighted the data and the hot deck technique imputed missing weight and height data. A total of 5018 individuals residing in Goiás were stratified by sex, age group, education level and health macro-regions. Operational, demographic characteristics and prevalence of risk factors were evaluated, with crude and adjusted prevalence ratios calculated using the Poisson regression model. Results: Mobile telephony offered some operational advantages, while refusal rates were lower for landlines. Landline telephony underestimated men, adults and individuals with fewer years of schooling, while mobile's underestimated the elderly. Significant differences in prevalence were found for 16 indicators. Mobile phone users showed higher prevalence of risk factors, while landline's showed higher prevalence of protective factors. Conclusion: The use of both landline and mobile telephony was necessary to ensure population representativeness. However, new strategies are needed to improve participation in future surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.