ArticleResearch in psychotherapy (Milano)2025
The relationship between overall defensive functioning and the Personality Assessment Inventory borderline and treatment outcome scales.
Article in Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Personality, Emotion Regulation, and Psychological Distress in Italian Women with Feeding and Eating Disorders: A Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mature defense mechanisms support patients' engagement in psychotherapy. The Overall Defensive Functioning (ODF) scale of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) Defensive Functioning Scale (DFS) is a measure of the maturity of patients' defenses. Immature defenses (e.g., splitting) and poor emotion regulation are hallmarks of borderline personality organization, and both can interfere with positive treatment engagement. We predicted that ODF would significantly and negatively correlate with the Personality Assessment Inventory Borderline (PAI-BOR) scales, PAI Treatment Rejection (PAI-RXR) scale, and the PAI Treatment Process Index (PAI-TPI). To our knowledge, no studies have examined the relationship between ODF scores, as measured by the DFS rating of Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) narratives, and defense levels, PAI-BOR Full Scale (PAI-BOR-FS), PAI-RXR, and PAI-TPI scales. The sample included 73 outpatients from an academic hospital. Patients were administered the PAI and a TAT protocol. Two psychologists independently rated 40 TAT protocols with the observer-rated DFS for reliability. Healthy defenses showed significant negative correlations with PAI-BOR-FS (r=-.27), PAI-BOR Negative Relationships (PAI-BOR-N) (r=-.38), and PAI-RXR (r=.30). The pathological defenses had positive correlations with four of the five PAI-BOR scales and the PAI-TPI. There were significant correlations between ODF and the treatment related scales, PAIRXR (r=.37, p<.01) and PAI-TPI (r=-.32, p<.01). ODF significantly and negatively correlated with the PAI BOR-FS (r=-.36, p<.01) and its subscales, Affective Instability (r=-.35, p<.01) and Negative Relationships (r=-.39, p<.01). High and low ODF groups had significant and meaningful differences on all seven PAI scales. Overall, these findings provide support for the construct validity and clinical utility of the DFS defense levels (healthy, neurotic, and pathological) and the global ODF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.