Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560555›Full record

SynthesisActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2026

Kangaroo Mother Care Is Beneficial for Both Infants and Parents: An Umbrella Review.

Edwina Hurme, Ulla Sankilampi, Leena Hintikka, Ilari Kuitunen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edwina HurmeInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Ulla SankilampiInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Leena HintikkaDepartment of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.
Ilari KuitunenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-8178-9610

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the overall effectiveness of kangaroo mother care (KMC) for newborn infants and parents.

methodsIn February 2024, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched to identify systematic reviews with meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials that investigated KMC. Two authors independently screened the literature to identify relevant studies, which were extracted by one author and verified by another author.

resultsThirty-one systematic reviews with meta-analyses were included in the umbrella review. KMC demonstrated multiple benefits for infants, such as improved thermoregulation, glycemic stability, head circumference growth, reduced infection risk, shorter hospital stays, and enhanced physiological stability. Among preterm or low-birthweight newborn infants, KMC was associated with reduced mortality when compared to standard care, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Maternal benefits included higher breastfeeding rates and improved psychological well-being among mothers practicing KMC compared to mothers who did not practice KMC.

conclusionThe KMC intervention provides numerous advantages for both infants and mothers. As a safe, simple, and cost-effective intervention, KMC should be widely promoted and integrated into neonatal practices globally. However, limitations in the quality of evidence from previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses warrant cautious interpretation of the findings.

Indexed as

Kangaroo-Mother Care MethodFemaleHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, Newbornkangaroo mother carelow birthweightneonatal mortalitypreterm birthskin‐to‐skin contact

Identifiers

PMID41560555
PMCPMC13063357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.