ReviewKorean circulation journal2026
Shared Decision-Making in Chronic Stable Angina and Severe Aortic Stenosis.
Review in Korean circulation journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) is the process that promotes the agreement between treatment choices based on patient values and medical knowledge. For chronic stable angina, this involves facilitating decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and guideline-directed medical therapy according to personalized risks and benefits associated with these 2 treatment options. In severe aortic valve stenosis, SDM again comes to play, this time to select between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement. The implementation of SDM in South Korea faces challenges, including limited patient involvement and preference for physician-driven decisions. Structural improvements cover multidisciplinary heart team discussion and patient education tools which integrate SDM well into enhancing patient-centered care by addressing these barriers to improve treatment accessibility and outcome in the South Korean healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.