ReviewKorean circulation journal2026
Assessment of Myocardial Stiffness With New Echocardiographic Methods.
Review in Korean circulation journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High-Frame-Rate Echocardiography: A New Frontier in Noninvasive Functional Assessment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial stiffness is a key determinant of cardiac function. So far, its assessment required invasive methods such as pressure-volume loop measurements or mechanical testing of tissue biopsies, which are both not suited for daily clinical use. However, recent advances in echocardiography offer promising non-invasive alternatives. Initial clinical studies in different pathologies are encouraging and indicate a huge potential of these new ultrasound-based techniques for evaluating myocardial stiffness. In this review, we explain the concept of myocardial stiffness, explore the most promising ultrasound techniques currently available for its evaluation, and discuss key insights from recent clinical research in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.