Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560478›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pathology. Clinical research2026

AI for pathologists: a universal lymph node metastasis detection app that enhances efficiency while preserving diagnostic accuracy.

Jennifer Vazzano, Bindu Challa, Vidya Arole, Konstantin Shilo, Sarah Reuss, Peter Kobalka, Swati Satturwar, Juan Xie, Dongjun Chung, Saba Shafi and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pathology. Clinical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jennifer VazzanoDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9977-1259
Bindu ChallaDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Vidya AroleDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Konstantin ShiloDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Sarah ReussDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Peter KobalkaDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Swati SatturwarDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Juan XieThe Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Program in Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Dongjun ChungThe Interdisciplinary Ph.D. Program in Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Saba ShafiDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
David KelloughDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Erin PalerminiDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Zaibo LiDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Wei ChenDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Anil ParwaniDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Shaoli SunDepartment of Pathology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasing workload combined with the shortage of pathologists is the leading cause of diagnostic errors and delays. Nonetheless, in clinical practice, pathologists often spend hours on tedious tasks such as counting mitoses and searching for lymph node micro-metastasis, which may yield unreliable results. The advent of digital pathology and the development of artificial intelligence (AI) applications (app) for image analysis have opened new possibilities for improving the efficiency and accuracy of pathologists. However, the perceived black box nature of AI has led to skepticism among many pathologists about its diagnostic capabilities, resulting in a lack of trust in AI. In addition, it is a common belief that AI applications should be limited to the areas they were trained in, which has significantly limited their generalizability. Given the homogeneous cell population of lymph nodes and overlapping of tumor morphology across different organs, we hypothesized that a lymph node metastasis detection application trained on a few organs could potentially recognize metastasis from multiple organs. We used the commercially available Visiopharm app (AI tool), initially trained on lymph node metastases from breast and colon cancer, to detect metastasis of 12 distinct types of cancer from 15 organ systems based on the analysis of 172 slides (all with corresponding immunohistochemical staining confirmation). Furthermore, by using the annotation map generated by the app as a guide, pathologists were also able to reduce the time spent searching for metastasis substantially (from 54.7 to 42.1 s per slide on average) without compromising diagnostic accuracy. With pathologists serving as the trusted gatekeepers and the development of more sophisticated image analysis applications, the use of AI can help to address the shortage of pathologists, enhance their performance and eventually improve patient care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesPathologistsFemaleHumansIntelligent SystemsPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of Resultsartificial intelligence (AI)cancer diagnosticscomputational pathologydiagnostic efficiencydigital pathologyimage analysislymph node metastasis

Identifiers

PMID41560478
PMCPMC12820412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.