Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560466›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of animal ecology2026

Social information about others' affective states in a human-altered world.

Luca G Hahn, Jordan McDowall, Margaux Vanhussel, Mike Mendl, Alex Thornton

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of animal ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca G HahnUniversity of Exeter, Penryn, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5187-1039
Jordan McDowallUniversity of Exeter, Penryn, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8623-5846
Margaux VanhusselUniversity of Liège, Liège, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7188-1912
Mike MendlUniversity of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5302-1871
Alex ThorntonUniversity of Exeter, Penryn, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1607-2047

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council DTP3: BB/T008741/1Leverhulme Trust RGP-2020-170Wild Animal Initiative C-2023-00054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a result of human-induced environmental change, animals increasingly face challenges that differ from those encountered throughout their evolutionary history. While this has caused dramatic declines for many species, some can persist by gathering information to reduce uncertainty, thereby minimising risks and exploiting new opportunities. The strategic use of social information can be particularly useful in enabling such uncertainty reduction. Here, we argue that the behavioural and affective states of others provide vital social information for animals to guide evaluations of risks and opportunities. Specifically, attending and responding to indicators of others' affective states through processes such as emotional contagion may facilitate information transmission. For instance, when exposed to a novel, ambiguous anthropogenic stimulus that could indicate either an opportunity or a threat, animals may use social information about others' affective states to decide whether to approach or avoid the stimulus. To increase immediate and long-term benefits, individuals might also alter their social behaviour and information use flexibly based on critical early-life experiences, the socio-ecological context or the behaviour and states of associates in the social network. Finally, given that an individual's affective state can influence how it copes with changing environments and makes appropriate decisions, we argue that there is a need for greater synergy between animal welfare and conservation efforts. Bridging the gap between ensuring individual-level welfare and population-level resilience will be crucial for ethical policies to protect wild animals responsibly in the face of human-induced rapid environmental change.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsBehavior, AnimalConservation of Natural ResourcesSocial BehaviorAnimalsAnimal WelfareHumansaffective statesbehavioural flexibilitycognitionconservationenvironmental changesocial informationuncertaintywelfare

Identifiers

PMID41560466
PMCPMC13439601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.