ArticleYonsei medical journal2026
Clinical and Neuroimaging Findings in Patients with Atypical Visual Field Defects.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the clinical presentations and neuroimaging findings of patients with atypical visual field defects (VFDs). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 159 patients who underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of atypical VFDs between 2013 and 2022. Clinical characteristics were compared based on neuroimaging results, and logistic regression was performed to identify independent risk factors for significant findings.
resultsTwenty-nine patients (18.2%) exhibited significant findings responsible for their atypical VFDs, most commonly intracranial tumors and cerebrovascular accidents. Older age [odds ratio (OR) 1.049, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.018-1.081,
conclusionAtypical VFDs may indicate lesions along the visual pathway. Neuroimaging is recommended for patients with atypical VFDs, particularly those of older age or presenting with decreased visual acuity, rapid progression or incomplete homonymous hemianopsia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.