ArticleMedicine2026
Type II hereditary angioedema with an apparently de novo SERPING1 mutation in China: A case report and family screening.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the Index Case: A Practical Framework for Cascade Family Screening in Hereditary Angioedema.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleType II hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a rare and underrecognized condition. Early diagnosis and family screening are essential to prevent life-threatening attacks. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 36-year-old woman presented with recurrent facial swelling and dysphagia unresponsive to standard treatments. DIAGNOSES: Laboratory analysis revealed decreased C4 and low functional C1 inhibitor (C1-INH) activity with normal antigenic levels, confirming type II HAE. Whole-exome sequencing identified a heterozygous SERPING1 mutation, c.1397G > A (p.Arg466His), classified as pathogenic (ClinVar Accession: VCV000003946.13). Three daughters carried the same variant.
interventionsThe patient received subcutaneous icatibant for acute management and prophylactic lanadelumab. Her daughters were counseled and provided with emergency medication. OUTCOMES: Over 7 months of follow-up, the patient remained attack-free without adverse effects. Her daughters were asymptomatic or mildly affected. LESSONS: This case emphasizes the need to consider HAE in unexplained recurrent angioedema and demonstrates the clinical utility of genetic testing and family screening. Lanadelumab was effective and well-tolerated for prophylaxis, consistent with current guideline recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.