Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560110›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2026

Comparison of 3-dimensional echocardiographic left ventricular volume assessment from different acoustic windows.

Kyoung-Woo Seo, Jin-Sun Park

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kyoung-Woo SeoDepartment of Cardiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.

Funding

Daewoo Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) has been reported to be accurate and precise in left ventricular (LV) volume assessment. We validated the accuracy of 3DE for quantifying LV volume acquired from various different acoustic windows. Twenty patients with good acoustic windows were enrolled. The 3DE images were acquired from the point of maximal intensity (PMI) (A, apical 4-chamber view), the point of 1 intercostal space above from the PMI (B), the point of medial side of PMI with angling probe laterally, toward the patients' left shoulder (C, right ventricular modified 4-chamber view) and the point of 4th intercostal space of midclavicular line (D). The measurements of LV volume at end diastole and end systole by 3DE acquired from 4 different acoustic windows were done offline and analyzed. We set the LV volume quantified from image of apical 4-chamber view as the standard LV volume. Linear association between the methods was measured with simple linear regression analysis and with Pearson correlation coefficient. Bland-Altman plot was created to calculate the limits of agreement. The end diastolic and end systolic LV volumes measured from apical 4-chamber view ranged from 45.7 to 105.5 mL and from 17 to 35.5 mL. Using simple linear regression analysis and Bland-Altman plot analysis, both the end diastolic and end systolic LV volumes measured from each image acquired from each positions showed high agreement. Using the semi-automated analysis tool of the QLAB Advanced Ultrasound Quantification Software Release 8.1, the maximal time required for the volume measurement of images from A, B, C and D were 180, 208, 248 and 359 seconds, respectively. Our results demonstrated the feasibility and accuracy of 3DE for clinical assessment of LV volume irrespective of any acoustic windows.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, Three-DimensionalHeart VentriclesAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of Results3-dimensional echocardiographyleft ventricular volume

Identifiers

PMID41560110
PMCPMC12826220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.