Observational studyMedicine2026
Epidemiological profile of paraquat poisoning in tertiary care center of eastern Nepal: A retrospective observational study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Paraquat Poisoning: When Intensive Care Meets the Limits of Medicine.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Both farmers and gardeners use paraquat, since it is efficient yet toxic, as it does not have a commonly used treatment if people are exposed. Common causes of death are acute respiratory distress syndrome, problems with the kidneys, and the failure of several major organs. In this study, the outcomes of patients who took part in the research were reviewed using data collected from admissions during a year period. All cases were caused by intentional self-harm, and out of these, 60% got acute kidney injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome, while 80% had a mix of metabolic and respiratory acidosis. Out of all the patients, half developed multi-organ dysfunction syndrome and a lethal outcome resulted for 50% within 24 hours. In a third of cases, the treatment was ended when family decided to discharge them against a doctor's advice, but only a fifth of patients were able to go to a high-dependency unit. Regardless of using hemodialysis, corticosteroids, and other support measures, a huge number of patients died. It is noted that paraquat poisoning is very dangerous and calls for better treatment options, where early hemoperfusion might have a positive impact on survival outcomes. Out of the herbicides registered worldwide, paraquat is the most hazardous and dangerous to people. Early use of hemodialysis, corticosteroids, and other medical support did not lead to a major drop in patients' death rates. Quick administration of hemoperfusion is a promising way to raise the survival chances of patients who are poisoned with paraquat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.