Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560085›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2026

Exercise amounts, barriers, and preferences among patients with cancer.

Qianqian Wang, Sunga Kong, Suh-Jung Kang

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qianqian WangSports Science Research Center, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sunga KongSamsung Advanced Institute of Health Sciences & Technology (SAIHST), Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7313-7786
Suh-Jung KangSports and Health Care Major, College of Culture and Arts, Sangmyung University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study analyzed exercise amounts, preferences, and barriers among individuals without cancer (Group 1), individuals diagnosed with colorectal, breast, endometrial, or prostate cancer within the past 5 years (Group 2), and those diagnosed >5 years ago (Group 3) in China. We included individuals aged 18 to 75 from a Chinese university hospital in 2021. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 162, 154, and 157 individuals, respectively. Data were collected using questionnaires and analyzed using analysis of variance, Chi-square analysis, correlation coefficients, and multiple regression analysis. Patients with cancer and survivors reported lower amounts of total, moderate-intensity, and vigorous-intensity exercise than healthy individuals, whereas no difference existed in the amount of low-intensity exercise. The exercise barriers differed significantly among the 3 groups, except for psychological barriers. Exercise preferences also differed significantly among the 3 groups. Multiple regression analysis identified physical barriers, family-related barriers, and preferences for exercise venue, intensity, and type as significant predictors of total exercise amount. It is vital to address long-term exercise barriers faced by patients with cancer and survivors, especially those diagnosed within the last 5 years, who show more physical limitations, fewer resources, and lower motivation. Tailored strategies should consider survivors' preferences to promote exercise participation.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsExerciseNeoplasmsPatient PreferenceAdolescentAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adultcancer survivorsexercise barriersexercise preferenceslevel of exercise

Identifiers

PMID41560085
PMCPMC12826227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.