ArticleMedicine2026
The role of combined ultrasonic BI-RADS and ultrasound elastography in discriminating between benign and malignant breast nodules.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enhancing diagnostic precision for BI-RADS 4a breast nodules: A multimodal AI model integrating ultrasound radiomics, hemodynamic signatures, and clinical profiles.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research is designed to examine how well the combination of ultrasonic breast imaging-reporting and data system (BI-RADS) classification and ultrasound elastography (UE) works in discriminating between benign and malignant breast nodules (BNs). It also seeks to confirm the clinical applicability of this combined approach in diagnostically challenging cases involving dense breast tissue and small BNs. We retrospectively reviewed 280 patients with BNs (142 assessed by BI-RADS alone, and 138 evaluated with the combined approach) between March 2023 and February 2025. Using pathological biopsy as the gold standard, the diagnostic performance - including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and Kappa value - of the 2 groups was compared. Additional subgroup assessments focused on dense breast tissues (American College of Radiology categories C/D) and small nodules (≤5mm). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of BI-RADS combined with UE in the diagnosis of malignant BN were 91.30%, 86.96% and 89.86%, respectively (Kappa = 0.886), which was better than that of BI-RADS alone. In addition, the diagnostic sensitivity of BI-RADS combined with UE for dense nodules and small nodules was also higher than that of BI-RADS alone (P <.05). The combined use of ultrasonic BI-RADS and UE enhances diagnostic accuracy by concurrently evaluating morphological features and tissue stiffness, offering improved differentiation between benign and malignant BNs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.