ArticleMedicine2026
Exploration of treatment after multiline chemotherapy in recurrent head and neck cancer: Case report.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
rationaleTreatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) remains challenging, especially after resistance develops to conventional chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and targeted agents. Novel formulations, such as polymeric micellar paclitaxel (pm-Pac), which offer a Cremophor-free delivery system, warrant investigation in salvage settings to overcome resistance and improve outcomes. PATIENT CONCERNS: Two patients with locally advanced HNSCC experienced multiple disease recurrences following several surgical resections. Both had received prior taxane-based chemotherapy alongside radiotherapy, anti-EGFR therapy, and immunotherapy, yet developed progressive disease, highlighting the clinical dilemma of managing multiply relapsed, treatment-refractory HNSCC. DIAGNOSES: Both patients were diagnosed with R/M HNSCC, demonstrated low PD-L1 expression (TPS 2% and 3%, respectively), and negative EBER status.
interventionsFollowing progression on multiple prior lines of therapy, both patients received salvage regimens containing pm-Pac in combination with platinum, fluorouracil, and either an immune checkpoint inhibitor (tislelizumab, case 1) or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (lenvatinib, case 2). The treatment was administered for 6 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy. OUTCOMES: The pm-Pac-based combination therapy achieved significant tumor regression. In case 1 (ear canal primary), the target lesion was reduced by 43.1%, resulting in a progression-free survival (PFS) of 8.2 months. In case 2 (laryngeal primary), a 59.1% reduction was observed, with a PFS of approximately 11 months. Treatment was generally tolerable, with manageable grade 2 neutropenia as the primary adverse event. LESSONS: These 2 cases suggest that reintroducing paclitaxel in its novel polymeric micellar formulation, pm-Pac, within a combination regimen may overcome prior resistance and provide meaningful disease control in heavily pretreated R/M HNSCC patients. This approach represents a potentially viable salvage strategy, warranting further clinical investigation to confirm its efficacy and optimal integration into the treatment sequence for refractory HNSCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.