Observational studyMedicine2026
Application of evidence-based nursing in nursing practice of patients with pelvic fracture.
Observational study in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the outcomes of using evidence-based nursing care for patients with pelvic fractures. Eighty patients who had suffered a pelvic fracture had their medical records reviewed retrospectively. There was a treatment window of 2021 and 2022. A total of 80 patients were split in half to test the effects of 2 distinct nursing approaches. Forty patients were assigned to the observation group and got evidence-based nursing care, whereas the same number were assigned to the control group and received standard care. Both groups' nursing effects were evaluated and contrasted. Compared to the control group, the observation group fared better on the Majeed scale and fared worse on the VAS scale (P < .05). Compared to the control group, the observation group had decreased rates of death and complications (P < .05). The observation group fared better than the control group on measures of coagulation function, operational status, and mental health (P < .05). Patient satisfaction with nursing care was greater in the observation group than in the control group (P < .05). It is important to study and spread the use of evidence-based nursing practices, since doing so may greatly enhance the nursing impacts, decrease the risk of complications, and boost patients' prognoses after a pelvic fracture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.