Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41560043›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

The clinical pathological significance of ILK and FABP4 protein expression in EHCC.

Jun Yu, Xing-Guo Tan, Fan Zhou, Meng-Zhi Xiao, Wei Feng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jun YuDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Yueyang Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Yueyang, China.ORCID 0009-0004-8434-6072
Xing-Guo Tan
Fan Zhou
Meng-Zhi Xiao
Wei Feng

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigates the clinical and pathological significance of integrin-linked kinase (ILK) and fatty acid-binding protein 4 (FABP4) expression in EHCC. We utilized EnVision immunohistochemistry technology to assess the expression levels of ILK and FABP4 in 100 cases of patients with EHCC. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.0 (Chicago). The proteins ILK and FABP4 exhibited elevated expression levels in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) tumors when compared to peritumoral tissues, adenomas, and normal biliary tract tissues, with statistical significance noted (P <.05 or P <.01). A significant positive correlation was identified between the expressions of ILK and FABP4 in EHCC (P <.01). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that EHCC patients with positive expression of ILK and/or FABP4 had significantly reduced survival times in comparison to those with negative expression (P = .000). Additionally, Cox multivariate analysis indicated that positive expressions of ILK and/or FABP4 serve as independent prognostic factors associated with poor outcomes in EHCC patients. The area under the curve for ILK was calculated to be 0.687 (95% CI: 0.600-0.773), while for FABP4, it was 0.638 (95% CI: 0.548-0.728). The current research demonstrates that the positive expression of ILK and FABP4 is significantly linked to the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, pathological characteristics, biological behaviors, and unfavorable prognosis in EHCC.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisScaffold Protein ILKBiomarkers, TumorFABP4 protein, humanFatty Acid-Binding ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesScaffold Protein ILKEHCCextrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaFABP4ILKimmunohistochemistrypragnosis

Identifiers

PMID41560043
PMCPMC12826184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.