Trial reportMedicine2026
Evaluation of Ahmed glaucoma valve versus Ex-PRESS shunt implantation with conbercept therapy in neovascular glaucoma.
Trial report in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research Progress of Diabetes-related Glaucoma: Mechanisms, Impacts and Management Strategies.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Review
- Neovascular glaucoma: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and contemporary management.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neovascular glaucoma (NVG) is a vision-threatening condition commonly associated with uncontrolled intraocular pressure (IOP). Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation and Ex-PRESS shunt insertion are 2 frequently applied surgical techniques. This study aimed to compare the short-term and 1-year outcomes of these procedures when combined with intravitreal conbercept therapy. Forty-four patients diagnosed with NVG were randomly allocated to either the AGV group (n = 24) or the Ex-PRESS group (n = 20). All participants received adjunctive intravitreal conbercept injections. Postoperative assessments (including IOP, best-corrected visual acuity, iris neovascularization regression, use of antiglaucoma medication, and complication rates) were conducted on day 1, week 1, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. No significant difference in IOP reduction was observed between the 2 groups up to 6 months after surgery. At the 12-month follow-up, mean IOP was significantly lower in the AGV group (18.17 ± 4.41 mm Hg) compared with the Ex-PRESS group (21.60 ± 5.25 mm Hg; P = .02). Improvements in best-corrected visual acuity, regression of iris neovascularization, and surgical success rates were comparable between the 2 groups during the early postoperative period. Nevertheless, AGV implantation showed a sustained advantage in long-term IOP control. Both AGV and Ex-PRESS implantation combined with conbercept provide effective and safe short-term management for NVG. Over a 1-year period, AGV implantation demonstrated better IOP control, indicating its potential benefit for long-term outcomes in NVG treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.