ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
Real time monitoring of hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis under deep saline aquifers conditions.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring biohydrogen producing potential of Arctic ice and water through metagenomics and dark fermentation kinetics.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Subsurface Life on Earth as a Key to Unlock Extraterrestrial Mysteries.Microbial biotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the microbial response to deep underground gas injection, specifically CO2 and H2, a new optically transparent high-pressure reactor was developed to monitor autotrophic microbial growth via in situ and ex situ characterization techniques. The main advantages rely on avoiding any decompression phases during the entire process, thanks to direct optical access. Here, we monitored the growth of the model methanogenic strain Methanothermococcus thermolithotrophicus by applying different H2/CO2 partial pressures at a total pressure of 100 bar, which is representative of the deep underground storage environment. These reactors can be used to investigate deep microbial strains under pressure conditions close to their natural environments, eliminating decompression biases. Additionally, we measured the methane production of the strain at the end of the incubation, with or without stirring. The results showed an increase in methane production with increasing CO2 and H2 partial pressures, up to p(H2/CO2, 80/20 mol%) = 15 bar for unstirred conditions and p(H2/CO2, 80/20 mol%) = 30 bar for stirred conditions, respectively. This difference in behavior depending on stirring conditions was clearly observed through biofilm formation in the absence of stirring, favoring methane production and extending the range of H2 / CO2 partial pressures under which the strain can grow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.