ReviewJournal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Novel Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers.
Review in Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advanced integrated SERS-based strategies for the early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2026Review
- Novel Liquid Biopsy in Gastrointestinal Cancers.Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers represent a significant global health burden, being among the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. The prognosis for patients remains unsatisfactory, largely because most cancers are detected at advanced stages. Traditional diagnostic methods, such as radiological and histopathological examinations and serum tumor markers like AFP, CEA, CA-125, and CA-199, possess limitations in sensitivity and specificity, particularly for early screening. A major drawback of tissue biopsy is its inability to fully capture the inherent heterogeneity within tumors, as mutations can differ between primary and metastatic sites. In this context, liquid biopsy has emerged as a promising, minimally invasive alternative for detecting cancer-associated materials present in various body fluids. The concept of liquid biopsy, initially centered on circulating tumor cells, has expanded to encompass other critical biomarkers such as circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicles, and circulating tumor RNA. Analyzing these biomarkers using advanced techniques like next-generation sequencing or proteomics can unveil a wealth of potential information. Liquid biopsy offers numerous advantages, being less invasive, more convenient, potentially more cost-effective, and providing a dynamic, real-time snapshot of the entire tumor burden that reflects both intertumoral and intratumoral heterogeneity. This review provides an overview of key liquid biopsy biomarkers and their associated detection technologies, discusses their burgeoning clinical applications across various GI cancer types, and highlights the current challenges and future directions in this rapidly evolving field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.