ArticleBMC health services research2026
Frequent emergency department users in Finnish public healthcare - a nationwide registry-based study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of diabetes on clinical outcomes in acutely ill patients - a study on patients admitted to the emergency department.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFrequent users of emergency departments (ED) often have complex healthcare needs and chronic conditions, contributing markedly to the overall ED burden. This study aimed to characterise frequent ED users in Finnish public healthcare and study frequent ED use among patients with chronic diseases.
methodsThis was a nationwide registry-based cross-sectional analysis using national register data from the Finnish Care Register and Statistics Finland, we analysed all adults (≥ 18 years) who used public healthcare services in 2018 (N = 3.05 million). ED users were classified as frequent (≥ 4 visits/year) or infrequent. Logistic regression assessed associations between frequent ED use and variables including age, sex, region, multimorbidity, and prior healthcare use. Spearman correlation evaluated associations with 2017 service use.
resultsIn 2018, 1.4% (41,880 individuals) were frequent users, contributing 24.3% of all ED visits. Frequent users were older (mean age 65 vs. 55 years) and more often multimorbid (30.5% vs. 10.1%) than infrequent users. Prior ED use was the strongest predictor of future frequent use (Odds Ratio (OR) 22.43). Multimorbidity increased the odds of frequent ED use (OR 4.26; 95% CI: 4.15–4.38, p < 0.001). Psychiatric and behavioural disorders related to substance abuse (14.4%), chronic kidney disease (6.5%) were among the conditions with the most frequent ED use. The most common patients among all ED users were those with hypertensive diseases (21.9%), other diseases of the heart and pulmonary circulation (10.3%), and they also had a high prevalence of frequent ED use 2.9% and 5.6% respectively.
conclusionsA subgroup analysis of frequent ED users, particularly those with multimorbidity and chronic cardiac, pulmonary, or psychiatric conditions, can inform policies for integrated care and resource allocation. Targeted interventions and improved coordination across primary, specialised, and social care could reduce ED use and overall system burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.