Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559693›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2026

Adapting the ADAPTE framework for Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines: a methodological study.

Xiuli Xie, Yangyang Wang, Heba Hussein, Hui Li, Yasser Sami Amer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiuli XieResearch Group of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Yangyang WangResearch Group of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China.
Heba HusseinDepartment of Oral Medicine and Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Hui LiResearch Group of Standardization of Chinese Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Guangzhou, 510120, China. lihuitcm@126.com.
Yasser Sami AmerPediatrics Department & Clinical Practice Guidelines and Quality Research Unit, Corporate Quality Management Department, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 72204061Research Project of Guangdong Provincial Bureau of Traditional Chinese medicine 20251166the Special Research Fund for Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine No. YN2020QN17/ YN2023QN05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical practice guideline adaptation is critical for standardizing care, yet existing frameworks like the ADAPTE process lack specificity for Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), whose principles diverge fundamentally from western medicine. To address this gap, we modified the ADAPTE process to align with the unique characteristics of TCM. A dual-tiered working group (core team and expert panel) simulated tested the original ADAPTE process on Traditional Chinese Medicine clinical practice guidelines (TCM CPGs), identifying challenges such as incompatibility with TCM diagnostic frameworks and holistic treatment paradigms and formed the initial version of ADAPTE-TCM. 21 experts were invited to evaluate the initial version of ADAPTE-TCM and reached a high consensus, while also providing suggestions for modifications to the initial version. Ultimately, 20 steps were modified (e.g., evidence synthesis, consensus-building) and integration of TCM CPGs specific evaluation criteria and tool. The resulting ADAPTE-TCM framework provides methodological rigor for adapting TCM CPGs. This adaptation not only bridges a critical gap in TCM CPGs adaptation but also exemplifies how evidence-based methodologies can evolve to respect diverse medical traditions.

Indexed as

AdaptationADAPTEAdjust and expandGuidelines

Identifiers

PMID41559693
PMCPMC12817658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.