Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559672›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2026

HPV persistence and CIN2 + Detection in women with normal cytology and Non-16/18 High-Risk HPV positivity.

Süleyman Özen, Eda Güner Özen, Gülin Özuyar Şimşek, Ali Onur Arzik, Serkan Karaoğlu, Celal Akdemir, Muzaffer Sanci

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Süleyman ÖzenDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey. drsuleymanozen@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4870-2840
Eda Güner ÖzenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1102-9741
Gülin Özuyar ŞimşekDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0764-8750
Ali Onur ArzikDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5878-0391
Serkan KaraoğluDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-1348
Celal AkdemirDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4070-7583
Muzaffer SanciDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, İzmir City Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-8494-4302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe optimal management of women with non-16/18 hrHPV infection and normal cytology remains a topic of clinical debate. While immediate colposcopy is often considered, current international guidelines recommend a follow-up approach. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of immediate colposcopy in detecting high-grade lesions in this intermediate-risk population.

methodsThis retrospective study included 454 unvaccinated women with non-16/18 hrHPV positivity and normal cytology results. Immediate colposcopic biopsy was performed in 142 patients with abnormal colposcopic findings. The remaining 312 women with normal colposcopy were followed with repeat hrHPV testing and cytology at 12 months. Those with persistent infection underwent colposcopy and biopsy if indicated. Histopathological and clinical outcomes were compared between the immediate and delayed colposcopy groups.

resultsCIN2 + lesions were identified in 10 patients (7.0%) within the immediate colposcopy group. Of the 276 women in the non-biopsy group who completed follow-up, 89 (32.2%) showed persistent hrHPV infection, and 29 underwent colposcopic biopsy. No CIN2 + lesions were detected in this delayed evaluation group. The difference in CIN2 + detection rates between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.033). Persistent hrHPV infection was more frequently observed in CIN2 cases than in CIN3, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.545).

conclusionsAll high-grade lesions in this cohort were detected at initial colposcopy, whereas delayed colposcopic evaluation after documented persistence yielded no additional CIN2 + diagnoses. These findings support the safety of a follow-up-based management strategy and suggest that colposcopic referral should be guided by hrHPV persistence rather than initial positivity alone. This approach may help reduce overtreatment and optimize resource use in populations with low HPV vaccination coverage.

Indexed as

ColposcopyHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPapillomavirus InfectionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultBiopsyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaeRetrospective StudiesVaginal SmearsCervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+),Colposcopic assessment,HPV-based cervical cancer screening,HPV genotype-specific risk stratificationNon-16/18 hrHPV genotypes,Normal cytology with hrHPV positivity,Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) infection,

Identifiers

PMID41559672
PMCPMC12903544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.