Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559661›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2026

The effects of case-based, problem-based, and team-based learning on nursing students' problem-solving, self-directed learning, and communication skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ya Zou, Wenzhao Xie, Hui Huang, Dan Liu, Qing Zhou, Qifeng Yi, Xiaoliang Tong, Ping Mao

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ya ZouDepartment of Nursing, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Wenzhao XiePostgraduate Medical Education Department of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hui HuangDepartment of Nursing, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qing ZhouDepartment of Nephrology and Rheumatology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Qifeng YiDepartment of Nursing, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiaoliang TongDepartment of Dermatology, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. 601630@csu.edu.cn.
Ping MaoDepartment of Nursing, The Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China. ping.mao@csu.edu.cn.

Funding

Degree & Postgraduate Education Reform Project of Central South University 2024JGB063Hunan Province Education Science Planning Project XJK24CXX002Undergraduate Teaching Reform Innovation Project of Hunan province 202401000358
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundModern teaching methods, including case-based learning (CBL), problem-based learning (PBL), and team-based learning (TBL), offer significant advantages over traditional teaching by promoting active student engagement and practical application. However, a systematic and comprehensive evaluation of the effectiveness of the three modern teaching methods in nursing education remains lacking. This study aims to evaluate the effects of CBL, TBL, and PBL on nursing students’ problem-solving abilities, self-directed learning, and communication skills.

methodsA comprehensive literature search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library, up to May 2025. We included experimental and quasi-experimental studies with control groups that quantitatively compared the effects of CBL, PBL, or TBL with other teaching methodologies in nursing students. The risk of bias was judged using standard tools. Effect sizes were estimated using a random-effects model and reported as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup meta-analyses were conducted to compare intervention effects based on intervention methods, duration, student grade, study design, and sample size, along with heterogeneity tests, publication bias tests, and sensitivity analyses.

resultsFrom an initial pool of 4581 articles, 27 were included in the systematic review, among which 16 (3 experimental studies and 13 quasi-experimental studies with a control group) were used for meta-analysis. Modern teaching methods significantly improved nursing students’ problem-solving abilities (SMD = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.57–1.53), self-directed learning (SMD = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.43–0.71), and communication skills (SMD = 1.80, 95% CI: 0.80–2.80). Specifically, CBL (SMD = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.19–2.52), PBL (SMD = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35–0.76), and TBL (SMD = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.21–2.83) all substantially enhanced students’ problem-solving capabilities. TBL (SMD = 1.94, 95% CI: 0.26–3.62) significantly improved communication skills, while PBL (SMD = 1.69, 95% CI: -0.45-3.83) showed a non-significant effect in communication skills.

conclusionsModern teaching methods can effectively enhance the problem-solving abilities, self-directed learning, and communication skills of nursing students. Future research should focus on larger sample sizes, higher methodological quality, more rigorous study designs, and the inclusion of diverse learning outcomes. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: The review was preregistered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (02/06/2025, #CRD420251060257).

Indexed as

CommunicationEducation, NursingProblem-Based LearningProblem SolvingSelf-Directed Learning as TopicStudents, NursingHumansCase-based learning (CBL)Meta-analysisNursing studentProblem-based learning (PBL)Problem-solving, self-directed learning, and communication skillsTeam-based learning (TBL)

Identifiers

PMID41559661
PMCPMC12895853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.