ArticleBMC public health2026
Barriers and enablers to the utilisation of prison-based voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) among incarcerated men: a qualitative study from Maula Prison, Malawi.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prevalence of HIV in Malawi is 7.1% among the general population and 16% among men who are incarcerated, indicating a widespread epidemic. To enhance HIV prevention in the nation, the Ministry of Health has made efforts to offer voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) services in prisons as an intervention to strengthen HIV prevention in the country. However, little is known about the barriers and enablers to the utilisation of VMMC among men who are incarcerated.
methodsThis phenomenological qualitative study aimed to explore the experiences of men who were incarcerated while utilising prison-based VMMC services at Maula Prison in Lilongwe. Data were collected through interviews with 7 men who are incarcerated and 7 prison staff, resulting in a sample of 14 participants. A thematic content analysis approach was used to analyse data from both men who were incarcerated and prison staff, guided by the social ecological model, to identify individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors influencing VMMC utilisation.
resultsBoth enablers and barriers to VMMC utilisation were identified. Key enablers included improved hygiene, motivation from peers and prison staff, availability of peer educators in the prison, exemption from hard labour during recovery and the availability of VMMC services within the prison. Major barriers consisted of fear of post-operative pain and complications, stigma and mockery from peers, spread of misconceptions about VMMC, shortages of healthcare personnel, limited VMMC-specific training among healthcare workers, overcrowded prison cells, and inadequate post-operative support resources such as soap, water, and nutritious food.
conclusionThe study concluded that while VMMC is generally acceptable among men who are incarcerated, utilisation is shaped by a combination of individual knowledge, interpersonal influences, and organisational conditions within the prison environment. Addressing these multilevel barriers is essential to enhancing VMMC utilisation among men who are incarcerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.