ArticleBMC public health2026
Adolescent mental health and social inequality in the aftermath of COVID-19 in Bogotá, Colombia: a qualitative study using a critical ecological model.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAdolescence is a stage of life characterised by significant biological, social, and emotional changes, making it a particularly challenging period for mental health. Young people face these challenges within environments shaped by social, cultural, and economic dynamics, often rooted in structural inequality. In urban contexts such as the megacity of Bogotá, many adolescents live in conditions of social inequality. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified pre-existing issues and introduced new challenges to adolescent mental health. This study explores the mental health of adolescents living in an urban setting characterised by social inequality, including both the benefits and challenges associated with the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsUsing a qualitative approach, direct observations were conducted in public schools and socially vulnerable neighbourhoods in Bogotá. Complementary problem-centred interviews were carried out with adolescents and school counsellors at three public schools in these areas. The interviews focused on topics related to social inequality, mental health, and key experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. A reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. The research adhered to national and international ethical guidelines.
resultsA total of 95 h of field observation were conducted, alongside 42 interviews with adolescents aged 12-18 (57% female) and six school counsellors, most of whom were female psychologists. The findings are presented through the the Critical Ecological Model of Adolescents' Mental Health, which illustrates adolescents' mental health and its changes concerning the pandemic across four levels: (a) personal: self-care, life plans, emotional distress, and post-pandemic coping; (b) interpersonal: family and peer relationships; (c) community: support networks, disadvantage, and violence; and (d) organisational/media: school-based support and mental health promotion and care.
conclusionsIn urban settings marked by social inequality, supportive environments within families, schools, communities, and institutions are essential. Engaging with adolescents' perspectives highlights both their needs and their capacities to navigate challenges and support mental health across different contexts. Structural strategies are required to confront social inequalities and promote both individual and collective actions to support adolescent mental health, particularly in post-pandemic contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.