Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559592›Full record

SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026

Women's perceptions of urinary incontinence during the postpartum period: systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Cristina Gallego-Gómez, Ana Torres-Costoso, Vicente Martínez-Vizcaíno, Claudia Andrea Quezada-Bascuñán, Sandra Martínez-Bustelo, Julián Ángel Basco-López, Asunción Ferri-Morales, Héctor Martínez-Martínez

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristina Gallego-GómezFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda, Carlos III S/N, Toledo, 45071, Spain.
Ana Torres-CostosoFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda, Carlos III S/N, Toledo, 45071, Spain. anaisabel.torres@uclm.es.
Vicente Martínez-VizcaínoHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.
Claudia Andrea Quezada-BascuñánFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda, Carlos III S/N, Toledo, 45071, Spain.
Sandra Martínez-BusteloFaculty of Physiotherapy, Psychosocial Intervention and Functional Rehabilitation Research Group, University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Julián Ángel Basco-LópezFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda, Carlos III S/N, Toledo, 45071, Spain.
Asunción Ferri-MoralesFaculty of Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Avda, Carlos III S/N, Toledo, 45071, Spain.
Héctor Martínez-MartínezHealth and Social Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Cuenca, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrinary incontinence is a common condition in the postpartum period, although most women do not seek help because they believe that their problems resolve spontaneously. Urinary incontinence has been associated with feelings of distress, shame, anxiety, depression, and social isolation. This systematic review of qualitative studies aimed to enhance the knowledge of postpartum women's perceptions of urinary incontinence, particularly their feelings and problems in their daily lives.

methodsThis qualitative evidence review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024596647) and conducted in accordance with the ENTREQ reporting guidelines. From inception until 19th December 2025, a comprehensive search of qualitative findings was conducted across the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, PsycINFO and CINAHL databases, and grey literature sources (the ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, OpenGrey, Google Scholar, and the Zenodo repository). Additionally, reference lists of the included studies were also screened. Studies reporting a qualitative analysis of the perceptions associated with urinary incontinence in postpartum women were included. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research was used to assess study quality. A thematic synthesis approach was applied to generate codes and themes through inductive, data-driven analysis. The GRADE-CERQual approach was used to assess confidence in each synthesized finding.

resultsThe review included 15 studies comprising 712 postpartum women (20–45 years old) who had delivered vaginally, by cesarean section, or via both modes. The postpartum period was defined as the first 12 months after childbirth. The review included studies from various countries, including Turkey, the Netherlands, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, China, Ireland and the United States, conducted between 1999 and 2025. Three analytical themes emerged: the perception of urinary incontinence as not a problem, the feelings associated with urinary incontinence, and problems in daily life. The GRADE-CERQual appraisal indicated high confidence in all synthesized findings.

conclusionsThis meta-synthesis highlights the impact of postpartum urinary incontinence on women’s well-being, causing discomfort, anxiety, and sadness despite its normalization. The findings emphasize the need for better education, healthcare, and support, with health professionals encouraged to provide early interventions to improve postpartum well-being.

Indexed as

Postpartum PeriodUrinary IncontinenceFemaleHumansPerceptionPregnancyQualitative ResearchAfter deliveryFeelingsMeta-synthesisPelvic floor disordersThematic synthesisWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID41559592
PMCPMC12905965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.