Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559579›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2026

Appropriate length of epidural catheter in epidural space for labour analgesia with dural puncture epidural combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus.

Peng Liu, Yi Chen, Peng Ma, Rui Qin, Yongqiang Shi, Xinli Ni

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06602440 (Observations on the Effect of Different Depths of Epidural Catheter Retention on the DPE Technique Combined With the PIEB Mode of Labor Analgesia:a Single-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06602440 naunknown statusnot on this map

Observations on the Effect of Different Depths of Epidural Catheter Retention on the DPE Technique Combined With the PIEB Mode of Labor Analgesia:a Single-center, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled102ConditionsLabor AnalgesiaArmsThe indwelling length of epidural catheter is 3 centimeters., The indwelling length of epidural catheter is 5 centimeters., The indwelling length of epidural catheter is 7 centimeters.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China.
Yi ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China.
Peng MaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China.
Rui QinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China.
Yongqiang ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China.
Xinli NiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, PR China. xinlini6@nyfy.com.cn.

Funding

Program of Ningxia Medical University XM2023055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique combined with programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) has been widely used in the clinical practice of labour analgesia. Whether varying the length of catheter threaded into the epidural space benefits for DPE combined with PIEB the resultant analgesia remains unclear.

methods102 women in labour were enrolled, aged 18–45 years, with cervical dilation > 3 cm and a numeric rating scale (NRS) score > 4, were randomly (1:1:1) assigned to three study groups (the epidural catheter threaded 3, 5, or 7 cm into the epidural space) for labour analgesia. The primary outcome was time to reach adequate analgesia, defined as the interval from the administration of the initial bolus (10 mL of 0.1% ropivacaine with 0.3 µg/mL sufentanil) until the NRS score ≤ 3. Secondary outcomes included pain score, anesthetic consumption, duration of labour, adverse events (pruritus, nausea, hypotension, unilateral block, catheter dislodgment, motor blockade) and Apgar scores.

resultsMedian time to reach adequate analgesia was significant different among three group: 5.2 min vs.7.0 min vs. 8.1 min in 3, 5 and 7 cm insertion, P = 0.001; the incidence of pruritus was 32.4% vs. 20.6% vs. 5.9% in three group, P = 0.001. There were no differences in other severe adverse events among group, the incidence of nausea was 32.4% vs. 17.6% vs. 14.7% in three group, p = 0.272. Hypotension occurred in four patients in the 3 cm group, one in the 5 cm group, and two in the 7 cm group, p = 0.090. Unilateral block was observed in four patients in the 7 cm group, one in the 3 cm group, and two in the 5 cm group, p = 0.119. Pain score, local anaesthetic consumption, labour duration, catheter dislodgment, motor blockade, and Apgar score of the newborns were statistically insignificant.

conclusionDuring labour analgesia with DPE combination with PIEB, when the epidural catheter is left 3 cm in the epidural space, the onset of action is faster, but the incidence of pruritus is higher. Therefore, in order to minimize either catheter or drug-related complications and provide satisfactory analgesia, the appropriate length of catheterization for epidural labour analgesia maybe 5 cm, but larger multicenter studies are warranted to confirm generalizability. TRIALL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06602440); retrospectively registered on 17 September, 2024.

Indexed as

Analgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalAdolescentAdultAnesthetics, LocalCatheterizationEpidural SpaceFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyRopivacaineSufentanilTime FactorsYoung AdultAnesthetics, LocalRopivacaineSufentanilDural puncture epiduralEpidural catheterLabour analgesiaProgrammed intermittent epidural bolus

Identifiers

PMID41559579
PMCPMC12903318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.