Observational studyBMC gastroenterology2026
Inflammatory indices as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Observational study in BMC gastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) remains a high-risk emergency with non-negligible in-hospital mortality. Inflammatory indices derived from routine admission tests may provide additional bedside information reflecting inflammatory burden and physiologic reserve, but their prognostic value in UGIB is not well defined.
methodsIn this retrospective single-center observational study, 502 consecutive adults admitted via the emergency department with UGIB (December 2022–2024) were analyzed. Demographic, clinical (including melena/hematemesis), comorbidity, bleeding etiology (variceal vs. non-variceal), endoscopy-related variables when available, transfusion status, and laboratory data were extracted from electronic records. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and neutrophil-to-albumin ratio (NAR) were calculated at admission. Predictors of in-hospital mortality were assessed using ROC analysis and logistic regression; two multivariable models were reported to address overlap between melena and hematemesis.
resultsOverall in-hospital mortality was 9.4% (47/502). Non-survivors had lower admission hemoglobin, albumin, and platelet counts and higher INR. PLR, PNI, and NAR were associated with mortality in univariable analyses. In multivariable Model 1 (including melena), low PLR (OR = 4.734, 95% CI = 2.352–9.529; p < 0.001), low PNI (OR = 3.041, 95% CI = 1.488–6.216; p = 0.002), lower hemoglobin (OR = 0.896 per 1 g/dL increase, 95% CI = 0.809–0.992; p = 0.035), and melena (OR = 2.318, 95% CI = 1.131–4.747; p = 0.022) were independently associated with mortality. In Model 2 (melena replaced by hematemesis), low PLR (OR = 3.890, 95% CI = 1.894–7.989; p < 0.001), hematemesis (OR = 4.922, 95% CI = 2.385–10.157; p < 0.001), and lower hemoglobin (OR = 0.900 per 1 g/dL increase, 95% CI = 0.811–0.998; p = 0.046) remained significant, whereas PNI and NAR were not independently associated. ROC discrimination for PLR/PNI/NAR was modest (AUC 0.612/0.604/0.594, respectively), indicating limited stand-alone predictive performance.
conclusionAdmission PLR showed the most consistent independent association with in-hospital mortality across alternative multivariable models, while the independent contribution of PNI appeared model-dependent. Given the modest AUCs, these indices should be interpreted as adjunctive markers alongside clinical and endoscopic assessment rather than as stand-alone predictors. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized data capture are warranted to evaluate their incremental value within established UGIB risk stratification pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.