Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559544›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2026

BioMark: biomarker analysis tool.

Mehmet Ali Balikci, Cyrille Mesue Njume, Ali Cakmak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mehmet Ali BalikciIstanbul Technical University, 34867, Istanbul, Maslak, Turkey.
Cyrille Mesue NjumeIstanbul Technical University, 34867, Istanbul, Maslak, Turkey.
Ali CakmakIstanbul Technical University, 34867, Istanbul, Maslak, Turkey. ali.cakmak@itu.edu.tr.

Funding

Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi TGA-2025-46998Türkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu 124N069Ulusal Yüksek Başarımlı Hesaplama Merkezi, Istanbul Teknik Üniversitesi 1009742021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biomarkers play a pivotal role in disease diagnosis and prognosis by offering molecular insights into biological states. The rapid growth of high-throughput omics technologies has enabled the generation of large-scale biomarker datasets, yet analyzing these complex, high-dimensional data remains a major challenge-particularly for researchers lacking advanced computational expertise. While numerous tools exist for omics data analysis, many fall short in providing an integrated, user-friendly environment tailored specifically for biomarker discovery and interpretation. To address this gap, we present BioMark, a web-based platform designed to streamline biomarker analysis across diverse omics types. BioMark integrates robust statistical methods with widely used machine learning algorithms to support key workflows including statistical analysis, dimensionality reduction, classification, and subsequent model explanation. The platform emphasizes accessibility, offering intuitive visualizations and automated reporting to facilitate interpretation and dissemination of results. Notably, BioMark also offers a feature-ranking strategy that consolidates outputs from multiple analytical methods, enhancing the robustness of biomarker identification. By lowering the barrier to advanced biomarker analytics, BioMark empowers a broader range of researchers to uncover clinically relevant molecular signatures and accelerate translational research. Biomark is available online at https://bioinf.itu.edu.tr/biomark .

Indexed as

BiomarkersComputational BiologySoftwareData AnalyticsHumansInternetMachine LearningBiomarkersArtificial intelligenceBiomarker discoveryDisease diagnosisMultivariate analysis

Identifiers

PMID41559544
PMCPMC12896108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.