ArticleKorean journal of family medicine2026
Potential role of regular physicians in improving health literacy in patients with chronic diseases: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Korea.
Article in Korean journal of family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Health literacy and primary care organization.Korean journal of family medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The availability of health information through media has raised public awareness of health literacy (HL). HL is essential for medication adherence and self-management in individuals with chronic diseases, and for those without chronic conditions, HL is important for promoting health and engaging in preventive behaviors. This study examined the role of having a regular physician in improving HL among Korean adults, both with and without chronic diseases. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis using data from 8,322 participants in the 2021 Korea Health Panel Study. HL was measured with the 16-item European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire. To identify factors associated with HL categories and to calculate adjusted mean HL scores, we used multiple logistic regression and weighted linear regression. Results: Among participants with chronic diseases (n=4,627), 56.6% reported having a regular physician, with the largest group (42.7%) showing inadequate HL. After adjustment, age 75 years or older and lower education were significantly linked to lower HL levels, regardless of chronic disease status. Having a regular physician was significantly associated with higher HL levels in participants with chronic diseases (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.63), but not in those without chronic diseases. Participants with chronic diseases who had a regular physician showed higher mean HL scores across all HL competencies and domains. Conclusion: Although access to health information has increased, the risk of encountering conflicting or misleading content has grown. These findings emphasize the importance of regular physicians in guiding patients and improving HL, especially among individuals with chronic diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.