ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Enhancing Explainability in AI-Based Interstitial Lung Disease Detection via Multi-Class Learning Based on Lesion Areas.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) comprises a group of lung disorders characterized by inflammation and fibrosis of the lung interstitium. Early detection is essential, yet identifying ILD on chest radiographs remains challenging. Recently, deep learning (DL) technologies have shown potential to improve diagnostic performance; however, their lack of transparency remains a major concern. This study employed a four-class classification scheme to develop a trustworthy and robust detection system for ILD. The explainability of three convolutional neural network (CNN) models and two transformer-based models was evaluated using Intersection over Union (IoU) scores and Dice coefficients, which quantified the consistency between actual lesion areas and the activation regions in heatmaps generated by five different visual explanation methods. The proposed four-class classification scheme yielded statistically significant increases in IoU scores and Dice coefficients for four visualization methods applied to the three CNN models, while maintaining equivalent classification performance compared with conventional binary classification. For the transformer-based models, the application of certain visualization methods to the four-class classification models also improved IoU scores and Dice coefficients, with the highest mean IoU and Dice coefficient reaching 0.356 and 0.483, although not across all combinations of visualization methods and DL models. These results demonstrate the utility of multi-class classification that leverages lesion area information to enhance model explainability. Furthermore, they underscore the importance of selecting suitable visualization methods for respective DL models. These findings may provide valuable insights to strengthen clinical decision-making, ultimately facilitating earlier detection and more reliable management of ILD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41559507What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.