Observational studyJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Impact of watercleft localization on higher-order aberrations and visual function.
Observational study in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study investigated the relationship between watercleft localization in crystalline lenses and higher-order aberrations. STUDY
designSingle-center, retrospective, observational study
methodsThe study included 131 right eyes from 131 patients. The patients underwent complete ophthalmic examinations, swept-source anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (Tomey Corporation), and wavefront analysis with a wavefront analyzer (Topcon Corporation). Waterclefts were classified according to the Kanazawa Medical University Cataract Classification and Grading System. On the basis of their location, the central and peripheral watercleft types were further categorized as anterior waterclefts (AWC) or posterior cortical waterclefts (PWC).
resultsThe total cross-sectional areas and volumes of the central waterclefts were 7.722 ± 5.926 mm
conclusionCentral-type waterclefts caused visual deterioration, with a significant correlation between size and visual function. For the same cross-sectional area and volume, the effects on higher-order aberrations and visual acuity were greater with C-PWC than with C-AWC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41559484What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.