ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Evolution of Breast Cancer Treatment 2010-2023.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of Axillary Surgical Management of Patients with Occult Breast Cancer with Axillary Metastasis.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Time Interval Between Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Completion and Mastectomy is Not Associated with 30-Day Complication Rate.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Breast Cancer in Women Aged ≤35 Years: A Single-Center Retrospective Comparative Analysis by Age Subgroup.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Perioperative diffuse optical imaging of blood flow distributions for porcine skin flap viability assessment.Journal of biomedical optics · 2026Article
- Balancing Risk and Reconstruction: A Comprehensive Review of Complications in Delayed Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Breast Cancer Surgery: Past, Present and Future-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Perioperative diffuse optical imaging of blood flow distributions for porcine skin flap viability assessment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the introduction of targeted therapies and the de-escalation of surgical operations, we aimed to describe recent changes in breast cancer treatment. PATIENTS AND
methodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients with clinical stage I-III breast cancer from 2010 to 2023 who underwent surgery. Cochran-Armitage trend tests and the Kaplan-Meier method were used.
resultsWe identified 1,769,438 patients; median age was 61 years, with clinical stage I (60.6%), stage II (32.7%), and stage III (6.7%). In total, 74.1% of patients had ER+/HER2-, 13.5% HER2+, and 12.3% ER-/HER2- disease. Most patients (62.7%) underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Mastectomy rates declined from 42.3% in 2010 to 33.3% in 2023 (p < 0.001); within mastectomy, reconstruction rate increased (36.5% to 48.8%) as did contralateral prophylactic mastectomy rates (31.6% to 47.6%), both p < 0.001. Rates of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) decreased (38.2% to 18.8%, p < 0.001). Omission of axillary surgery among clinical stage I patients increased (4.3% to 12.5%, p < 0.001). Rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased overall and especially among ER-/HER2+ (30.4% to 70.2%, p < 0.001) and ER-/HER2- (25.5% to 64.8%, p < 0.001) subtypes. Use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in ER+/HER2- disease increased from 2.8% to 6.0%, p < 0.001. Use of radiation therapy in patients treated with BCS declined (87.8% to 80.1%, p < 0.001). The 10-year overall survival varied by clinical stage group and biologic subtype.
conclusionsBreast cancer care has evolved, with decreased use of ALND and increased use of reconstruction and of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in patients undergoing mastectomy. Furthermore, there has been significant increase in neoadjuvant systemic therapy use, especially among HER2+ and ER-/HER2- biologic subtypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41559461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.