Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559386›Full record

Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Is Longer Better? Revisiting Compression Duration After Abdominoplasty with Diastasis Repair.

Agostino Bruno, Valerio Saccoccio

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Agostino BrunoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Burn Center, Sant' Eugenio Hospital and Private Practice, Rome, Italy. dott.agostinobruno@gmail.com.
Valerio SaccoccioPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Department of Surgical Science, Tor Vergata University of Rome, Via Montpellier 1, 00133, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0009-0008-0533-0478

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether prolonged postoperative compression provides clinical benefit after abdominoplasty with rectus diastasis repair. One hundred twenty patients were randomized to wear a standardized class-II abdominal compression garment for 1, 3, or 5 months. Outcomes included inter-recti distance (IRD) stability, edema, venous-lymphatic function, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), abdominal wall strength, return to activity, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. At 6 months, IRD stability in the 1-month group was non-inferior to the 3- and 5-month protocols, with mean IRD changes of + 1.2 mm, + 1.3 mm, and + 1.4 mm, respectively. Prolonged compression was associated with delayed edema resolution, reduced venous flow, and higher IAP at 1-3 months. Functional recovery was faster with shorter garment use; patients in the 1-month group demonstrated earlier return to activity and higher early trunk strength performance. Patient comfort was significantly better with shorter wear duration, while aesthetic satisfaction was similarly high in all groups by 12 months. Complication rates-including seroma and wound issues-were low and comparable among groups. Extended compression beyond the first postoperative month did not improve abdominal wall stability, contour, or patient satisfaction. Instead, it was associated with transient physiologic drawbacks and reduced comfort. A 1-month protocol followed by guided weaning provides optimal balance between mechanical support, recovery, and patient experience.Level of Evidence I This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

AbdominoplastyCompression BandagesDiastasis, MusclePostoperative CareAdultEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionRecovery of FunctionRectus AbdominisRisk AssessmentTime FactorsAbdominoplastyCompression garmentEdemaIntra-abdominal pressurePostoperative recoveryRectus diastasis

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.