Trial reportAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Is Longer Better? Revisiting Compression Duration After Abdominoplasty with Diastasis Repair.
Trial report in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether prolonged postoperative compression provides clinical benefit after abdominoplasty with rectus diastasis repair. One hundred twenty patients were randomized to wear a standardized class-II abdominal compression garment for 1, 3, or 5 months. Outcomes included inter-recti distance (IRD) stability, edema, venous-lymphatic function, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), abdominal wall strength, return to activity, patient-reported outcomes, and complications. At 6 months, IRD stability in the 1-month group was non-inferior to the 3- and 5-month protocols, with mean IRD changes of + 1.2 mm, + 1.3 mm, and + 1.4 mm, respectively. Prolonged compression was associated with delayed edema resolution, reduced venous flow, and higher IAP at 1-3 months. Functional recovery was faster with shorter garment use; patients in the 1-month group demonstrated earlier return to activity and higher early trunk strength performance. Patient comfort was significantly better with shorter wear duration, while aesthetic satisfaction was similarly high in all groups by 12 months. Complication rates-including seroma and wound issues-were low and comparable among groups. Extended compression beyond the first postoperative month did not improve abdominal wall stability, contour, or patient satisfaction. Instead, it was associated with transient physiologic drawbacks and reduced comfort. A 1-month protocol followed by guided weaning provides optimal balance between mechanical support, recovery, and patient experience.Level of Evidence I This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.