ArticleScientific reports2026
Lightweight SwiM-UNet with multi-dimensional adaptor for efficient on-device medical image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For medical image segmentation, transformer-based models have demonstrated superior performance. However, their high computational complexity remains a significant challenge. In contrast, Mamba provides a more computationally efficient alternative, though its segmentation performance is generally inferior to that of transformers. This study proposes a novel lightweight hybrid model based on U-Net, named SwiM-UNet, which represents the first Mamba–transformer hybrid model specifically designed for processing three-dimensional data. Specifically, efficient TSMamba (eTSMamba) blocks are incorporated in the early stages of the U-Net architecture to effectively manage computational overhead, while efficient Swin transformer (eSwin) blocks are employed in the later stages to capture long-range dependencies and local contextual information. Additionally, the model strategically integrates both the Mamba and Swin transformer architectures through a Mamba–Swin adapter (MS-adapter). The proposed MS-adapter comprises three sub-adapters that emphasize local information along the [Formula: see text]-, [Formula: see text]-, and [Formula: see text]-axes, as well as channel-wise features between the eTSMamba and eSwin modules, and includes gating mechanisms to balance the contributions of the sub-adapters. Moreover, a low-rank MLP is utilized in the encoder, and channel reduction is applied in the decoder to further enhance computational efficiency. Performance evaluations conducted on the publicly available BraTS2023 and BraTS2024 datasets demonstrate that the proposed model surpasses state-of-the-art benchmark models while maintaining low computational complexity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.