ArticleScientific reports2026
Structural equation modeling of safety integration and production pressure effects on safety performance in cement manufacturing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The cement industry continues to experience substantial production pressure driven by steadily increasing global demand. In this context, the present study investigates the relationship between safety integration and safety performance, with production pressure examined as a mediating variable. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was employed to analyze these relationships within the cement industry. Safety Integration included Labor Safety Accountability, Management Safety Accountability, and Contractor Safety Management, while Safety Performance was categorized into incident measurements (SPx), management actions (SPy), and continuous improvement efforts (SPz). Production pressure encompassed the Normalization of Unsafe Practices, Disruptions in Safety Protocols, and Production Pressure Intensity. Data from 238 participants, collected over 3 months were analyzed using SPSS and AMOS (version 23). Labor Safety Accountability consistently influenced safety performance (p < 0.001 on SPx, p < 0.001 on SPy, p = 0.001 on SPz), while Contractor Safety Management and Management Safety Accountability also showed significant effects (p = 0.011 on SPx, p < 0.001 on SPz). Production Pressure Intensity and Disruptions in Safety Protocols negatively affected safety performance (p = 0.014 on SPx, p = 0.026 on SPy) respectively, while Normalization of Unsafe Practices exhibited a weak influence. The findings confirm that safety integration significantly enhances safety performance, whereas production pressure exerts a substantial negative impact, diminishing overall safety outcomes in the cement industry. Unlike prior studies that largely examine safety performance in isolation, this research uniquely demonstrates how production pressure mediates the link between safety integration and safety outcomes in the cement industry, highlighting the dual challenge of maintaining productivity while safeguarding workers and offering new insights for both scholars and practitioners in high demand industrial sectors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.