ArticleScientific reports2026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of resident physicians and intern physicians on narrative medicine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study evaluated the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of resident and intern physicians regarding narrative medicine in Yunnan Province, China, in August 2024. A cross-sectional design was employed, utilizing a self-designed questionnaire to gather demographic information and assess knowledge and attitude. The practice was evaluated by Narrative Competence Scale. Out of 482 valid responses, 62.03% of participants were female, with 43.58% in their first year of residency and 46.06% having received narrative medicine training. The mean scores for knowledge, attitude, and practice were 49.32 ± 11.72 (possible range: 14–70), 21.99 ± 2.66 (possible range: 6–30), and 143.87 ± 23.52 (possible range: 27–189), respectively. Structural equation modeling revealed significant relationships: knowledge positively and directly impacted both attitudes (β = 0.550, P < 0.001) and practices (β = 0.341, P < 0.001), while attitudes directly influenced practices (β = 0.190, P < 0.001). Furthermore, knowledge affected practice indirectly through attitudes (β = 0.104, P < 0.001). The study concluded that resident and intern physicians exhibited moderate knowledge, moderate attitudes, and low engagement with narrative medicine. It suggested that incorporating narrative medicine into medical training could enhance KAP, thereby improving patient-centered care and communication in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.