ArticleSurgical endoscopy2026
Analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of early gastric cancers with different endoscopic curability categories after endoscopic submucosal dissection and related risk factors of non-curative resection.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThis single-center retrospective study aims to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of early gastric cancer (EGC) treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), stratified by endoscopic curability (eCura) categories. Additionally, we aim to identify the risk factors associated with non-curative resection (NCR) and the prediction model before ESD.
methodWe included patients with EGC undergoing ESD at Peking University Third Hospital from 2010 to 2024. Statistical analyses included chi-squared test and logistic analysis. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to investigate independent risk factors to predict NCR. Model performance was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with area under the curve (AUC) values quantifying predictive accuracy.
resultsA total of 540 individuals with 659 lesions were included. Univariate analysis identified smoking, H.pylori infection, upper/middle gastric location, 0-I/0-IIb-type, mucosal damage, tumor size > 30 mm, undifferentiated dominated histology, and submucosal (SM) invasion as significant predictors of NCR (all p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed prior-ESD independent predictors (smoking, H.pylori infection, proximal location, EUS-confirmed SM invasion). The prior-ESD model demonstrated an AUC of 0.783 (95%CI: 0.708-0.858) with 80.0% sensitivity.
conclusionThis study developed a prior-ESD prediction model for assessing NCR risk, which includes comprehensive clinicopathological data. The model might potentially improve curative resection rates and guide clinical decision-making for EGC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.