ArticleScientific reports2026
Barriers and facilitators of implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care using the CFIR-ERIC framework.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) are integral tools that capture real-time insights into patients’ experiences. Little is known about barriers and facilitators to PROMs implementation in the Asian context. This study explores the barriers, facilitators, and strategies for implementing PROMs from both patient and provider perspectives. We interviewed 33 patients and 27 healthcare providers from Singapore General Hospital and National University Hospital. Data were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The CFIR-Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tool was utilized to match implementation strategies to the identified barriers. All five domains of the CFIR framework were elicited. Facilitators included (1) Improvement in patient-healthcare provider communication, (2) Guidance relating to clinical judgement, (3) Patient empowerment, and (4) Clinician endorsement. Barriers included 1) Lack of local adaptation, (2) Cultural concerns, (3) Lack of coordinated effort, (4) Lack of formal training and (5) Disengaged healthcare workers). In total, 48 ERIC strategies were matched to the corresponding CFIR barriers. Implementing successful and sustainable PROMs requires a multifaceted approach that addresses identified barriers while strategically leveraging facilitators. Future efforts should emphasize PROMs’ value to patients and tailor strategies for diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.