Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41559303›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026

Assigned But Not Anchored: A Study of Primary Care Provider Utilization Among Covered California Enrollees.

Barbara Rubino, Erik Taylor, Renée Vera Hagen

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Barbara RubinoCovered California, Health Equity and Quality Transformation Division, Sacramento, CA, USA. Barbara.Rubino@covered.ca.gov.ORCID 0009-0009-7587-6828
Erik TaylorCovered California, Policy, Eligibility, and Research Division, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Renée Vera HagenCovered California, Policy, Eligibility, and Research Division, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-quality primary care is paramount for health equity and cost containment, yet many individuals lack access to a usual source of care. Since 2017, Covered California, the ACA Marketplace, has required all health plans to match enrollees with a PCP to serve as a first point of contact to promote high-value primary care.

objectiveTo understand primary care and overall healthcare utilization patterns for enrollees on ACA marketplace plans.

designThis study analyzed primary care utilization patterns across 1.1 million Covered California enrollees in 2022 under this policy and examined differences in usage of assigned and non-assigned PCPs across product types.

participantsIn total, 1,112,292 Covered California enrollees aged 18 years or older in 2022. MAIN MEASURES: Our main measures included utilization rates for assigned primary care providers (PCPs), utilization rates of other PCPs, utilization of all non-primary care services, and rates of non-utilization of healthcare services. KEY

resultsResults indicated that while enrollees in PPO or EPO plans had higher overall rates of PCP utilization, differences in PCP usage disappeared after correcting for demographic and clinical differences between enrollees in HMO and PPO/EPO plans. However, visits to non-assigned PCPs are common in all plan types. And, 43% of adult enrollees with 12-months continuous enrollment did not have any primary care visits.

conclusionsWe recommend that policy makers promote consistent utilization of any PCP regardless of PCP assignment, as we found that many people use other-than-assigned PCPs even when current policies intend to proactively steer them towards one main point of contact.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPhysicians, Primary CarePrimary Health CareAccess to Primary CareAdolescentAdultAgedCaliforniaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41559303
PMCPMC13493671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.