ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
Global Health in U.S. Internal Medicine: Pulling Strands into a Web.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
U.S. global health experienced marked growth over the last 25 years; however, within internal medicine in the U.S. there has been an absence of coordination across global health initiatives in different specialty groups. This contrasts with U.S. pediatricians, who have fostered connections across their specialty leading to impactful research, guidelines, and resources for pediatricians engaging in global health. We argue that U.S. internists with global health programs would benefit from increased collaboration, and believe this could specifically help to: 1) promote best practices across the field, including in ethics and advocacy; 2) share ideas to amplify the impact of individual programs; 3) increase multilateral global health projects that bring together multiple institutions or organizations; and 4) simplify the processes for international organizations seeking internal medicine partnerships. We provide potential next steps and hypothesize that other specialties across academic medicine could also benefit from such networking, especially given recent reductions in financial and political support for global health within the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.