ArticleScientific reports2026
Updated global prevalence and ethnic diversity of von Willebrand disease based on population genetics analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- von Willebrand disease: an illustrated review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Genetic determinants of clinical variability in type 2 von Willebrand disease: bridging genotype and phenotype.Haematologica · 2026Article
- Von Willebrand disease: classification and epidemiology.Haematologica · 2026Review
- Beyond a century of discovery: the global and persistent burden of underdiagnosis in von Willebrand disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Deep molecular modeling and mechanistic insights into type 2A von Willebrand disease with von Willebrand factor A2 domain mutations.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Exploratory Claims-Based Assessment of Diagnosed and Potentially Undiagnosed von Willebrand Disease in Japan.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
von Willebrand disease (VWD) is known as the most common inherited bleeding disorder. Despite this, some uncertainty remains regarding its prevalence and the distribution of different phenotypes worldwide and across ethnic groups. By leveraging genetic epidemiology approaches that enable population-scale estimates, the prevalence of VWD and its diverse phenotypes can be assessed more precisely. We estimated the global VWD prevalence and its distribution across distinct ethnic groups using the largest and most widely used publicly available genetic database. Available exome/genome sequencing data of 807,162 (730,947 exomes, 76,215 genomes) subjects from the Genome Aggregation Database (gnomAD-v4.1) were used. Based on the allele frequencies of 321 previously reported VWF pathogenic variants identified in the gnomAD population, the estimated worldwide prevalence of VWD per 1,000 individuals was 10.6 for type 1, 1.3 for type 2A, 1.7 for type 2B, and 1.5 for type 2 M. For the recessive forms of VWD, the global prevalence was estimated to be 33.9 cases per million for type 2N and 1.3 cases per million for type 3 VWD. Once structural variants and copy number variants from gnomAD that result in loss of function were included, the estimated prevalence of type 3 slightly increased to 1.8 per million. Additionally, VWD prevalence was found to vary significantly across different ethnic groups. This updated population-based genetic prevalence indicates a substantially higher than expected frequency of VWD. Our novel finding suggests that a large number of patients remain undiagnosed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.