ArticleScientific reports2026
Digital divide and healthcare service utilization among older adults with chronic liver disease in China: a nationwide cross-sectional study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Digital divide and health status among rural older adults in China: evidence from CHARLS.Global health action · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The digital divide may exacerbate healthcare disparities among vulnerable populations. However, evidence regarding its impact on healthcare utilization among chronic liver disease (CLD) patients remains limited, particularly using comprehensive multidimensional assessments. This study aimed to investigate the association between multidimensional digital divide and healthcare service utilization among Chinese adults with CLD. We analyzed data from 405 CLD patients (aged ≥ 45 years) from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) Wave 5 (2020). Digital divide was assessed through a comprehensive framework incorporating access, usage, and application dimensions, measured by internet use, device diversity, usage breadth, WeChat use, and mobile payment capability. Healthcare service utilization was defined as any hospitalization in the past year or outpatient visit in the past month. Multivariable logistic regression models, subgroup analyses, and sensitivity analyses including alternative outcome definitions, quartile analysis, and propensity score matching were performed. Among participants (median age 58.2 years, 51.6% male), 53.1% experienced digital divide. Healthcare service utilization was significantly lower among those with digital divide (hospitalization: 13.5% vs. 27.4%, P = 0.001; outpatient visits: 21.9% vs. 56.8%, P < 0.001). After full adjustment, standardized digital divide dimensions showed strong associations with healthcare utilization: access dimension (OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 2.18–3.84), usage dimension (OR = 3.13, 95%CI: 2.34–4.17), application dimension (OR = 1.67, 95%CI: 1.33–2.10), and overall score (OR = 3.63, 95%CI: 2.66–4.94). Significant age interactions were observed (P < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed robustness, with propensity-matched analysis showing OR = 2.63 (95%CI: 1.53–3.75). Multidimensional digital divide substantially impacts healthcare service utilization among CLD patients. Targeted interventions addressing digital disparities are needed to ensure equitable healthcare access in the digital era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.